10 best Apify alternatives for local business lead scraping (2026)
Compare 10 Apify alternatives for local lead scraping—listings vs owner contacts, pricing, exports, and cost-per-usable-contact testing.
10 best Apify alternatives for local business lead scraping (2026)
I’d choose based on what you need: business listings or owner contacts. For bulk listings, I’d compare Outscraper and Scrap.io first. For named owners, verified emails, and direct phones, I’d test LocalPipe on 100 records before paying for a larger plan.
LocalPipe reports a 60% verified-email rate in its best U.S. segments - a vendor claim, not a guarantee. My buying rule: <u>compare cost per usable contact, not cost per exported row</u>.
Quick Comparison
| Tool | What I’d use it for | Contact data and cost checks |
|---|---|---|
| LocalPipe | Local owner outreach | Owner enrichment; starts at $57/month; separate credit and export limits |
| Outscraper | Bulk Google Maps listings | Business contacts; about $3 per 1,000 raw records, with enrichment extra |
| Bright Data | Custom scraping pipelines | Check fields, pricing, and API terms for the chosen product |
| Scrap.io | No-code Maps list building | Listing-level contacts; starts around $49/month |
| PhantomBuster | Browser-based prospecting tasks | Check Maps support, runtime limits, and export options |
| D7 Lead Finder | Keyword-and-city searches | Business contacts; check daily search caps and API access |
| LeadSwift | Web design and SEO prospecting | Confirm coverage, contacts, pricing, and exports before buying |
| Octoparse | Visual scraping setup | Source-based data; check cloud scheduling and API access |
| Clay workflows | Enriching an existing list | Provider-based contacts; account for credits and provider fees |
| Apollo | Corporate B2B prospecting | Contact database - not a live Maps scraper; check export allowances |
I’d also check geographic coverage, email verification, CSV exports, API access, and CRM connections. Then I’d test the whole process - from search to CRM import - and review source terms and outreach rules before scaling.
Apify Alternatives: Choose by Lead Data Needs
1. LocalPipe
Listing coverage and contact depth
LocalPipe focuses on named owners and direct contacts, rather than raw listing extraction.
It searches Google Maps live by business type and city, state, or country, including international searches. Filters cover rating, review count, website presence, and price level. Owner discovery draws from 11+ sources, including business websites, Facebook, Instagram, BBB, Yelp, and Secretary of State filings. Its priority-based role search lets you rank titles instead of targeting just one.[2]
LocalPipe reports an owner-identification rate of about 75% and uses triple email verification. Outscraper and Apify are better suited to high-volume Google Maps extraction and custom scraping.[1]
Pricing and volume limits
These plan details come from the vendor. Check current limits before buying: business exports and enrichment credits have separate allowances.[1]
| Plan | Monthly price | Enrichment credits | Business exports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $57 | 2,000 | Up to 4,000 |
| Growth | $97 | 5,000 | Up to 10,000 |
| Pro | $157 | 10,000 | Up to 20,000 |
| Usage-Based | $97/month + usage | Usage-based | - |
The pricing suits teams that prioritize usable contacts over the number of records.
Credits apply to each successful field: a business email costs 1 credit, an owner email costs 2, and an owner phone costs 5. Requesting both an owner email and phone can use 7 credits if both succeed.[1]
Exports and automation
LocalPipe supports CSV export, a REST API, webhooks, and a Clay template for automation. You can also see how Clay and Apollo compare for local lead generation. The Data Recovery Panel recovers results from failed API or Clay runs. All plans include unlimited seats.[2]
For cheaper raw Google Maps records, you can compare Google Maps scraping tools like Outscraper in our next section.
sbb-itb-3041e27
Top Google Maps Scrapers for 2026 (RANKED)
2. Outscraper
Compared with LocalPipe, Outscraper focuses on raw business listings and generic website contacts.[1]
Listing coverage and contact depth
Outscraper pulls Google Maps business listings worldwide on demand. It offers a more focused approach than building a bulk Maps pull with Apify actors.[1][3]
Optional contact scraping collects emails and phone numbers from business websites, including inboxes like info@ and contact@. These are business-level contacts, not verified owner contacts.[1][3]
Pricing and volume limits
Outscraper uses pay-as-you-go pricing: about $3 per 1,000 raw records, or $9–$14 per 1,000 records with email scraping, validation, and phone enrichment.[1][3]
Apify’s costs depend on the actor and usage, making them less predictable than per-record pricing.[1]
Exports and automation
Export cleaned data through CSV or the API to move it into your CRM.[1][3]
Outscraper suits straightforward Maps pulls, while Apify supports custom scraping workflows.[1] For more technical scraping control, Bright Data comes next.
3. Bright Data
Listing coverage and contact depth
Bright Data is a more technical, build-your-own scraping layer than LocalPipe or Outscraper. It suits teams that need custom Google Maps scraping, rather than ready-to-use owner enrichment.
Check city coverage, available fields, and how often the data gets updated. If your local outreach needs owner names, verified emails, or direct phone numbers, plan for separate enrichment. LocalPipe is the better fit for that goal.
Pricing and volume limits
Ask how pricing covers usable records, failed requests, and enrichment add-ons. Then compare the total cost with the specific Apify actor you’d actually run.
Exports and automation
Web Scraper IDE supports custom builds with unblocking logic, while Data Collector offers no-code templates. Check API access, export formats, destinations, and scheduling.
For a less technical, more ready-to-use Maps option, compare Scrap.io next.
4. Scrap.io
Listing coverage and contact depth
Scrap.io gives teams a no-code way to find prospects on Google Maps without setting up a technical scraping stack.
It’s a Google Maps list builder covering 195 countries and about 4,000 categories. Filters like “has no website” and “email found” let teams build lists without custom scraping. This is a common shortcut to build local business lead lists faster by prioritizing accessible data. As a listing scraper, it’s closer to Apify and Outscraper than LocalPipe. [1]
The contact data is listing-level, not verified owner-level. Scrap.io scrapes emails but doesn’t verify that they belong to business owners, so results may include generic inboxes. LocalPipe is the better fit if you need to find the owner of a local business with verified emails and direct phone numbers. [1]
Pricing and volume limits
Plans start at about $49/month, with a trial available. Current lead quotas and overage rules aren’t disclosed. Unlike Apify’s usage-based model, Scrap.io’s fixed pricing makes recurring bulk pulls easier to budget for. [1]
Exports and automation
Scrap.io supports CSV and Excel exports, plus API access that’s limited on entry-level plans. There’s no native CRM sync: HubSpot and Salesforce users need to import CSVs or add an integration. It’s better suited to exporting lists than deeper automation or owner enrichment. [1]
Next, PhantomBuster covers automation-heavy prospecting workflows.
5. PhantomBuster
Listing coverage and contact depth
PhantomBuster is built for browser-based prospecting automation, not as a dedicated Google Maps lead database. It suits local prospecting that requires several browser actions. Before a large run, check its Maps support, available fields, and geographic coverage with the vendor.
Pricing and volume limits
Confirm the monthly price, runtime limits, and number of concurrent automation slots before comparing cost per usable lead. Factor in separate enrichment credits and the overhead of running automations.
Exports and automation
For multi-step prospecting workflows, check PhantomBuster’s session setup, export formats, API or CRM connections, and maintenance needs.
Next, compare D7 Lead Finder if your focus is list building.
6. D7 Lead Finder
Listing coverage and contact depth
D7 Lead Finder builds local prospect lists through keyword-and-city searches, returning emails, social profiles, and basic website data. It doesn’t offer SIC/NAICS filters or publish owner-find rates or a verification method, so you’ll still need to review results manually.
For quick list building, D7 is simpler than Apify. For owner contacts, it falls short of LocalPipe. [1] Pricing and limits are the next things to compare.
Pricing and volume limits
D7 is a low-cost option with monthly plans and daily search caps. Ask for current prices and limits before buying, then compare the total cost with Apify’s usage-based model. [1] Also check whether D7’s export formats work with your CRM.
Exports and automation
D7 supports CSV, XLSX, and JSON exports. Its Lead Search API lets you run searches and pull records, but CRM sync isn’t documented. Confirm that your plan includes API access before scheduling recurring searches. [1]
For SEO and web-design prospecting, LeadSwift is next.
7. LeadSwift
Listing coverage and contact depth
Unlike D7 Lead Finder, LeadSwift has not been verified in the supplied material as a local lead scraper, contact source, or workflow tool. Treat it as unconfirmed until you check its coverage, pricing, and export options directly.
For local outreach, LocalPipe remains the stronger fit if you need named owners, verified emails, and direct phone numbers. (It is critical to verify email addresses to protect your sender reputation.)
Pricing and volume limits
The supplied material does not verify pricing, quotas, or overage rules. Check the vendor’s current terms before comparing costs and limits.
Exports and automation
Export formats, API access, and automation support are also unverified. Don’t build a workflow around these features until you confirm them.
Next is Octoparse, another of the best Outscraper alternatives for a more configurable scraping workflow.
8. Octoparse
Listing coverage and contact depth
Octoparse lets you set up extraction tasks through a visual, no-code interface. For local outreach, LocalPipe is a better fit if you need owner names, verified emails, and direct phone numbers.
With Octoparse, the fields you can extract from local directories - and the geographic areas you can cover - depend on the source and task. They don’t come from a built-in lead database. You’ll still need to clean the raw data, remove duplicates, and verify it.[1]
Pricing and volume limits
Check current pricing, task limits, cloud capacity, scheduling, and API access before comparing the full cost of your workflow.
Exports and automation
Once you’ve set up extraction, check how it fits into repeat outreach. Desktop runs are local and manual. Cloud adds scheduling, API access, and IP rotation. Confirm which plan includes these features and whether its export formats work with your CRM.
Octoparse delivers raw data. LocalPipe turns local listings into owner-ready contacts.
Next is LeadSwift, an option for a simpler prospecting workflow after Octoparse.
9. Clay Enrichment Workflows
Listing coverage and contact depth
Clay starts with a list you already have. It’s an enrichment layer, not a Google Maps scraper. Import output from Apify or Outscraper, then use external providers to add owner details, emails, and phone numbers. Geographic coverage, owner-match rates, and direct owner phone availability depend on those providers - not just your Maps search.[1]
LocalPipe is the simpler option when your goal is local owner contacts.
Pricing and volume limits
With Clay, you pay for platform credits plus external provider costs. LocalPipe charges only for successful finds.[1]
Test 100 records in your niche before scaling. Compare the cost per usable owner contact and the actual verified-email fill rate.[1]
Exports and automation
Clay exports records to CSV and sends enriched records to HubSpot or Salesforce. LocalPipe can also feed verified owner contacts into Clay.[1][3]
Clay suits teams that need flexible enrichment workflows. You get more control than with LocalPipe, but field mapping, deduping, and provider management take more setup and maintenance.[1][3]
If you need a built-in contact database rather than a workflow layer, compare Apollo next.
10. Apollo
Listing coverage and contact depth
Apollo is a B2B database - not a live Google Maps scraper for local owner leads. It’s better suited to corporate prospecting than local SMB outreach. For verified local owner contacts, LocalPipe is the stronger fit. Check out our lead generation blog for more tactics on finding local business owners.
In a 1,000-record local plumbing test, Apollo returned 46 deliverable emails versus LocalPipe’s 580.[2]
Pricing and volume limits
Apollo uses a credit-based subscription model, so your cost depends on usage.[1]
Exports and automation
Apollo combines prospecting with email sequencing. Use it to match contacts after a live Maps scrape, but don’t treat that match as proof that the listing was checked live. A listing and an owner contact are two different things.
Business listings vs. owner contact data
Use listings to find prospects and verified owner contacts for outreach. Keep listing emails, owner emails, business phones, and owner phones in separate export columns.
Listing scrapers build prospect lists. Enrichment tools turn those lists into contacts you can use for outreach.
| Tool | Source and scope | Listing data | Owner enrichment | Email and phone types | Verification | Data age |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LocalPipe | Google Maps; international, strongest in the U.S. | 25+ business fields | Built-in owner discovery | Business emails/phones and verified owner emails/direct owner phones | Triple email verification | Live, on-demand enrichment |
| Outscraper | Google Maps; global | Raw listing fields | No dedicated owner identification | Generic business emails and phones | Scraped; optional validation | Live extraction |
| Bright Data | Multiple web sources; global | - | - | - | - | Real-time |
| Scrap.io | Google Maps; 195 countries | Business listing fields | - | Generic business emails and phones | Scraped; unverified | Live extraction |
| PhantomBuster | Multiple web sources; source-dependent | Workflow-dependent | - | Source- and workflow-dependent | Configuration-dependent | Run- and source-dependent |
| D7 Lead Finder | Maps and directories; niche and city searches | Basic business fields | - | Business/social contacts | - | - |
| LeadSwift | Maps and business directories; global | Business listings and presence data | - | B2B/business contacts | - | - |
| Octoparse | User-selected websites and directories | Custom extraction fields | - | Published source contacts | Configuration-dependent | Run- and source-dependent |
| Clay workflows | Connected providers and imported lists | Custom | Provider-dependent, not built-in | Business or owner contacts | Provider-dependent | Source- and enrichment-dependent |
| Apollo | Professional contact database; global B2B | Company and professional profiles | Limited for local SMBs | Professional B2B emails and phones | Email verification supported | Database refresh; record age unpublished |
_ - = undocumented. The supplied material does not confirm the feature. Configurable workflows do not mean owner enrichment is built in._
LocalPipe cross-references 11+ sources, including business websites, Facebook, Instagram, BBB, and Secretary of State filings.[1][2]
Clay’s output depends on its providers, matching logic, and validation steps. A waterfall alone does not prove that a contact owns the business. For Clay or Apollo workflows, keep the source, retrieval date, matched role, and verification status with each contact.[1][2]
Check source terms and privacy rules before collecting data. Public access does not grant permission for every use. U.S. B2B email must follow CAN-SPAM, while calls and SMS must meet applicable TCPA requirements, including consent where required.[1]
Next, compare pricing, volume limits, and trade-offs to see whether the data fits your budget.
Pricing, volume limits, and trade-offs
Compare the cost of usable contacts, not just exported rows. Check each vendor’s pricing, billing schedule, minimums, and overages. Raw scrapers cost less per row. Enrichment tools cost more but cut down on manual cleanup.
Use this table to compare the total workflow cost, not just the subscription fee.
| Tool | Entry cost and pricing model | Included allowance | Overages, minimums, and caps |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apify - baseline | Usage-based; cost depends on the Actor and resources used | Verify with vendor | Check Actor charges and platform usage separately. Usage depends on the Actor |
| LocalPipe | Starter: $57/month; credits are billed only on successful enrichments | 2,000 credits; 4,000 business exports | Separate enrichment and export caps; already-found records do not consume credits |
| Outscraper | About $3 per 1,000 raw records; email scraping and validation add to the cost [1] | Verify with vendor | Confirm current tiers, minimums, and caps |
| Bright Data | Verify with vendor | Verify with vendor | Confirm product, pricing model, and minimum commitment |
| Scrap.io | About $49/month [1] | Verify with vendor | Confirm export caps and overages |
| PhantomBuster | Verify with vendor | Verify with vendor | Confirm execution allowances and workflow limits |
| D7 Lead Finder | Subscription with search caps; verify price with vendor | Verify with vendor | Confirm search and export caps, reset periods, and upgrade requirements |
| LeadSwift | Verify with vendor | Verify with vendor | Confirm export limits and enrichment allowances |
| Octoparse | Verify with vendor | Verify with vendor | Confirm task, execution, and cloud-processing limits |
| Clay workflows | Enrichment-step charges | Provider- and workflow-dependent | Check provider charges, failed-step charges, and unused-credit terms |
| Apollo | Verify with vendor | Verify with vendor | Confirm email, phone, export, and API allowances separately |
Apify, Outscraper, and Scrap.io cost less for raw listings. LocalPipe costs more but delivers outreach-ready owner contacts. [1] Pick raw scrapers for listing-only projects and enrichment tools for owner outreach.
To compare cost per verified contact, test 50–100 records. Then divide your total spend by the number of verified contacts in your target role. [1][3]
Next, compare exports, API access, and automation.
Exports, automation, and tool selection
Once you’ve compared pricing, check how each tool sends local leads to your CRM. Exports and workflow automation are different things. CSV downloads work for occasional imports. Recurring pipelines need API access, webhooks, and field mapping. Keep the owner name, contact details, verification status, and a business ID so you can build a lead list of local business owners without duplicates. [3]
A scraping schedule doesn’t automate outreach. The table below compares export formats and how much automation each tool offers. [1][3]
| Tool | Exports and automation | Best fit / trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Apify | CSV, JSON, Excel; API, scheduling, storage, integrations | Custom scraping; custom setups need developer skills. |
| LocalPipe | CSV; API, webhooks, Clay integration; live enrichment with a 7-day update cycle | Verified owner contacts; no native CRM sync. |
| Outscraper | CSV, JSON; API, webhooks, scheduled cloud extraction | Raw listings; requires separate cleanup and verification. |
| Bright Data | Export and automation options vary by product | Large-scale scraping; check export, scheduling, and proxy options for your chosen product. |
| Scrap.io | CSV, Excel; limited API access on entry plans | Maps exports; no native CRM sync. |
| PhantomBuster | Prebuilt browser automations for web and social workflows | Not a dedicated Maps lead source. |
| D7 Lead Finder | CSV; daily search caps; limited automation | Quick local searches with CSV exports. |
| LeadSwift | CSV; daily search caps; light built-in outreach | List building and simple outreach. |
| Octoparse | No-code scraping | Best for visual, manual extraction workflows. |
| Clay enrichment workflows | CSV, JSON; API, waterfalls | Multi-provider enrichment workflows. |
| Apollo | CRM sync, sequences, dialer | Better for B2B outreach than local owner discovery. |
Test the entire workflow on a local sample that reflects your target market before scaling. Use your actual cities and categories, and include businesses with and without websites. Check how much owner-contact data you get, verify emails independently, and make sure exports reach your CRM without dropping verification fields or creating duplicates. Choose based on usable contacts, budget, volume, and manual effort - not just export size. [3]
FAQs
How can I confirm a contact is the actual owner?
Don’t stop at Google Maps listings. Confirm business ownership by checking business websites, social media profiles, Better Business Bureau listings, and Secretary of State filings.
LocalPipe cross-references live data from more than 17 sources and finds owner names about 75% of the time, compared with around 30% for DIY enrichment workflows. It also provides verified owner emails and direct phone numbers - not generic info@ inboxes.
How often should I refresh my local lead list?
Update your local lead list weekly [1][2]. Contact information and employment status change often, so records can soon become outdated [3].
Raw scrapers like Outscraper or Apify provide listing data that may need manual updates. LocalPipe’s API and data workflows update every 7 days, keeping your outreach current with live, verified contact details instead of outdated records [1][2][3].
How can I prevent duplicate leads across searches?
Don’t re-scrape or re-enrich lists you’ve already processed. Tools like LocalPipe automatically remove duplicate leads during enrichment and save previously enriched lists. You can download those lists again without spending more credits or repeating the work [1][2].
For large-scale outreach, split your target lists into smaller groups. This keeps your outreach organized and helps prevent overloading your email sending platform [2].